The proles lose again

Respect your masters:

A federal judge on Wednesday blocked the most controversial parts of Arizona’s immigration law from taking effect, delivering a last-minute victory to opponents of the crackdown. . . .

"There is a substantial likelihood that officers will wrongfully arrest legal resident aliens under the new (law)," Bolton ruled. "By enforcing this statute, Arizona would impose a ‘distinct, unusual and extraordinary’ burden on legal resident aliens that only the federal government has the authority to impose."

A housing project creates a "substantial likelihood" of increased crime, yet housing projects are legal. I always thought that someone had to actually break a law, not create a "substantial likelihood" of breaking a law before said someone could be convicted.

Incidentally, when we write regulations we use phrases like "substantial likelihood" when we want to give ourselves, as regulators, lots of flexibility during the actual implementation process. In other words, we use it when we’re not sure what to do and we’re making stuff up.

One Response to The proles lose again

  1. Jehu says:

    I long ago lost faith in the rule of law. The law is basically just a tool for the elite to screw the rest of us over. I believe this will not end well. Once around 10% of the population feels similarly to me, things will become incredibly ugly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: