When an agency writes a regulation, Congress does have a chance to review the regulation, thanks to a 1996 law (note that Congress did not have this power before 1996! and they had to pass a law to give themselves this!). The 1996 law was the ascendant Republican majority’s preferred method for dealing with the bureaucracy. Needless to say, it hasn’t done anything to rein in the bureaucracy, largely because it requires significant Congressional action to overturn the will of the bureaucracy (apparently it has happened once according to Wikipedia).

With Republican’s back on the ascent, they’ve come up with a new idea to rein in the bureaucracy – enter the REINS Act.

The REINS Act would change the process so that major regulations would be contingent on congressional approval — if a majority in each chamber does not vote “yes,” the regulation is not enacted.

A “major regulation” is a regulation that the OMB estimates will have “an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more.” To make this estimate, the OMB generally asks the agency that is writing the rule. Obviously, one has nearly unlimited scope to argue that a regulation will cost more or less than this, but let’s set this aside.

The REINS Act would require both houses of Congress to actually vote on each and every major regulation.

This would be awesome because it would be hysterical. You can go here and sort regulations by economic significance. You’ll see that there are a lot of significant regulations at any given time (and many many non-significant ones). Congress would effectively do nothing but debate things like whether there should be “Occupational Exposure to Crystalline Silica.”

Republicans have been trying to slow down the bureaucracy since Reagan tried the strategy of appointing heads of agencies who opposed the agencies they ran. Then they tried requiring cost/benefit analyses of regulations. Then they tried increasing Congressional review of regulations. None of these have worked.

The problem is that the bureaucracy is entirely unaccountable for regulations it issues and that it’s a part of the leftist establishment, along with the media and the universities (these parts of the system develop most of the ideas that turn into regulations – “science” which, by definition is anything done by an academic, is after all unquestionable. If science dictates that a certain regulation is necessary, who is a Congressman – anymore than a bureaucrat – to question science?). No amount of increased review of Congressional meddling will change this basic structure.


10 Responses to The REINS Act

  1. dearieme says:

    “to reign in the bureaucracy”: I seem to be in Primary School Teacher mode today.

  2. josh says:

    Don’t forget the great foundations that are the venture capitalists of science.

  3. Doug1 says:

    Do you think it would be possible for a Republican President to rescind the April 14 Obama administration letter to all university deans that required them to change the sexual assault and rape evidence standard in disciplinary hearings to a 50.1% more likely that rape or assault happened than that it was consensual??

    Say rescind it and require that at least that there be “clear and convincing evidence” (often called a 75% standard), if that’s what’s used for other disciplinary code violations, so as not to sexually discriminate against men under Title IX, who are almost always the ones accused in sexual assault and date rape cases.

    • Foseti says:

      It’s definitely possible to rescind it. However, I doubt they’d enforce a new standard

    • Doug1 says:

      I have a hard time seeing how requiring universities who get federal funds (all of them) to use a different lower standard of proof for disciplinary code violations that essential only men are accused of, but leaving universities full discretion on all violations that both sexes are accused of in substantially equal proportion, isn’t sex discrimination and a violation of Title IX.

  4. rasenroboter says:

    What’s up, this weekend is nice in favor of me, for
    the reason that this point in time i am reading this
    impressive educational piece of writing here at my residence.

  5. c says:

    Please let me know if you’re looking for a article writer for your site.
    You have some really great articles and I think I would be a good asset.
    If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d really like to write some articles for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine.
    Please shoot me an e-mail if interested. Many thanks!

  6. blog says:

    Very good article! We will be linking to this particularly
    great post on our site. Keep up the great writing.

  7. Debt Relief Options

    The REINS Act | Foseti

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: