Review of “A Feast for Crows” by George R. R. Martin

At the very end of this book, Martin explains that as he was writing it, he realized it was too long to publish as one book. Instead of cutting it in half and maintaining his chronological pattern, he decided to split the book by geographic locations.

He should have just cut the book in half.

In fairness to Martin, this book was better than I expected given that it’s the middle book of a seven book series. His decision to split the work by location failed pretty badly though. As a result of this decision, A Feast for Crows centers on characters that you don’t really like and peripheral characters, gives away a lot of what’s going to happen in the next book, and breaks up the continuous narrative that Martin had amazingly managed to maintain for three previous books.

Someone should re-edit books 4 and 5 arranged chronologically.

On to book 5.


2 Responses to Review of “A Feast for Crows” by George R. R. Martin

  1. Still waiting to see the last book that promises to tie it all up neatly.

  2. Ariston says:

    The problem with Martin is that he became immune to editing. He also makes it up as he goes along, which is a bad method to do a long–form series. I mean, he has some things that are obvious future reveals, but the plot has spun out of control and there’s a lot of nonsense that has happened. They had a lot of promise as being a great pulp series, but after book five, I think I’m done with them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: